Data Security Using Multi-Factor Authentication

ABSTRACT

Techniques are disclosed relating multi-factor authentication for data security. In some embodiments, a computer system receives, from a user device, a database operation request that specifies a set of query data, where the computer system supports multiple different security levels requiring different subsets of a set of authentication factors supported by a known device of a user of the user device. Various devices may determine current contextual information for the database operation request, where the contextual information indicates the set of query data. In some embodiments, the computer system compares the current contextual information with prior contextual information for database requests and then selects a security level from the different security levels. The computer system then initiates verification of a subset of authentication factors corresponding to the selected security level. In some embodiments, the computer system determines, based on the verification, whether to authorize the requested database operation.

BACKGROUND Technical Field

This disclosure relates generally to data security, and, morespecifically, to techniques for determining authentication requirementse.g., for requested database operations.

Description of the Related Art

Database management systems storing both production and non-productiondata often experience a decrease in performance when old data (e.g.,data that is no longer in use) accumulates over time, particularly insituations in which the database is not monitored to prevent suchaccumulation. This accumulation also dilutes the effectiveness ofanalytics applied across the data stored by such database managementsystems. On the other hand, if individuals can easily delete data fromsuch systems, this also introduces issues, such as accidental ormalicious deletion of data that should not be removed from the system.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an example system configured todetermine whether to authorize requested database operations, accordingto some embodiments.

FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating an example method for determiningwhether to authorize a database operation request, according to someembodiments.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating example computer systemconfigured to select a security level for a requested database operationusing a machine learning model, according to some embodiments.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating example contextual information,according to some embodiments.

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for determining whetherto authorize a requested database operation based on verification of asubset of authentication factors required by a selected security level,according to some embodiments.

FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for determining a subsetof authentication factors to verify for a requested database operationusing machine learning techniques, according to some embodiments.

FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating an example computing device,according to some embodiments.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Traditional techniques for authorizing database operations often includerequiring login credentials as well as a formal request for a databaseoperation. In response to receiving a database operation request,traditional security systems may display a pop-up message asking whetherthe requesting user is certain they want to perform the requestedoperation. Due to the generic nature of these pop-up messages as well asthe frequency with which these uses receive such messages, user may notactually read the messages. As a result, users often click a “yes”included in these messages without realizing what they are authorizing(e.g., they unintentionally delete or alter data). This in turn can leadto greater costs to entities who own this data, particularly insituations in which the deletion or alteration cannot be reversed. Inthe SALESFORCE.COM context, an organization as well as itsadministrators, users, customers, etc. may be at risk if data associatedwith this organization were to be accidentally deleted from either aproduction or non-production environment, or both. As such, theseplatforms make it difficult to delete data within an organization. Thisin turn, however, may reduce the performance of the organization as wellas dilute the value of analytics applied across such data (e.g., whendata of little value or purpose is not removed).

In contrast, the disclosed techniques implement multi-factorauthentication for database management systems e.g., which allows formanipulation of appropriate data, while maintaining a high level ofsecurity by only allowing authorized individuals to remove such data. Inparticular, this multi-factor authentication is catered to differentdatabase operations, providing varying levels of security according to agiven type of database operation included in a request as well as theindividual submitting the request. For example, database operations maybe performed for masking data, deleting data, archiving data, etc. Asused herein, the term “authentication” is intended to be construedaccording to its well-understood meaning in the art, which includesverifying an identity of an entity. For example, authenticating a usermay include determining whether the user is the owner of an account ordevice, or both. Multi-factor authentication techniques involveverification of more than one factor for a given user. For example, amulti-factor authentication process may involve verification of two ormore of the following categories of factors: what you are (biometricidentifiers, known behaviors, etc.), what you have (a credit card, akey, etc.), what you know (e.g., a personal identification number (PIN),a password, a key phrase, etc.). As one specific example, a first factorin a multi-factor authentication process may be a user logging intotheir device using a username and password, while a second factor may bea passive factor such as a geolocation of the user's device. Passivefactors do not require input from a user for verification.

In addition to observing the type of database operation specified in arequest, the disclosed security system may determine the context inwhich the request is submitted. Specifically, the system may determine atime the request was submitted, information about the device submittingthe request (e.g., geolocation, IP address, etc.), devices nearby therequesting device, etc. This information may be used to determine alevel of security necessary for the database operation request. Inparticular, the disclosed security system may determine a subset ofsupported authentication factors to be verified prior to authorizing therequested database operation.

The disclosed techniques apply multi-factor authentication technology tosolicit authorization by appropriate entities in a contextually relevantmanner that draws the attention of the entities to the details of arequest database operation. As such, these techniques may advantageouslyreduce or remove liability issues and risks associated with requesteddatabase operations. Said another way, the disclosed techniques mayreduce or prevent individuals from, accidentally or knowingly,performing database operations that manipulate data in an undesirable(and often irreversible) manner. Such techniques may improve the overallsecurity of database management systems, thereby increasing confidenceof entities utilizing such database management systems.

Database Security System

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an example system configured todetermine whether to authorize requested database operations. In theillustrated embodiment, system 100 includes database 150, user device120, and computer system 110, which in turn includes security module130, and comparison module 160.

Computer system 110, in the illustrated embodiment, receives a databaseoperation request 122 from user device 120. This request 122 specifies aset of data stored in database 150 that the user of device 120 wouldlike to query. In various embodiments, request 122 may be for a mask,archive, backup, restore, transfer, delete, replace, reconstruct, etc.operation for this set of data stored in database 150. Archiving datamay involve moving data that is no longer used from a productionenvironment to long-term storage, for example. The set of query dataspecified in request 122 may be for a staging environment, testingenvironment, production environment, etc. In response to receivingrequest 122, computer system 110 collects various contextual information162 from user device 120. User device 120 may be any of various types ofcomputing devices including mobile devices (cell phone, wearable device,etc.), desktop computers, laptops, etc. In some situations, user device120 is a personal device, while in others it is a work or businessdevice. In some embodiments, computer system 110 collects contextualinformation from other devices of the user of user device 120. Asdiscussed in further detail below with reference to FIG. 3, user device120 may be a mobile device with a downloaded authenticator application.

Comparison module 160, in the illustrated embodiment, comparescontextual information 162 for request 122 with contextual information164 for prior database operation requests. The prior contextualinformation may be for requests from user device 120 or from variousother user devices. Contextual information 162 and 164 is eitherinformation associated with the database operation itself or informationassociated with a requesting device (e.g., user device 120). Contextualinformation associated with the database operation itself includes: atime request 122 was made, a type of database operation requested (e.g.,mask, archive, backup, restore, transfer, delete, etc.), the set ofquery data (which may specify the type of data to be operated on e.g.,production data), an organization associated with the data, etc. Datamasking operations might include transforming the data to anonymize orpseudonymize it for security reasons. In some embodiments, a requesteddatabase operation may specify multiple different types of databaseoperations to be performed. For example, a single database operation mayrequest to both mask and archive a set of query data. Contextualinformation associated with a requesting device includes BLUETOOTHsignals from nearby devices, ambient noise, ambient lighting,accelerometer data, biometrics (e.g., heart rate, change in heart ratefrom a baseline heart rate, pulse oximeter data, change in pulseoximeter from a baseline, etc.), temperature, altitude, atmosphericpressure, IP address, information about the user associated with thedevice (name, login credentials, security clearance, etc.), etc.

Comparison module 160 determines whether contextual information 162matches contextual information 164 and to what extent. For example,comparison module 160 may determine how similar the current contextualinformation 162 is to contextual information for prior requests. Forexample, if four out of five pieces of contextual information for acurrent request and a prior request match, then comparison module 160may assign a strong similarity score to the two sets of contextualinformation. Further details for comparing contextual information fromcurrent and prior database operation requests are discussed below withreference to FIG. 4. Based on determining how similar a current requestis to prior requests, comparison module 160 sends a similarityindication 166 (which may include a similarity score) to security module130.

Security module 130, in the illustrated embodiment, selects a securitylevel 140 from a plurality of available security levels 140A-140N basedon the similarity indication 166. In the illustrated embodiment,security levels 140A-140N include respective subsets of authenticationfactors 142A-142N. The subsets of authentication factors may include oneor more factors supported by a known device of a user associated withthe requesting device. Each subset includes at least one authenticationfactor and at least one factor that differs from other subsets ofauthentication factors. For example, these authentication factors mayinclude any of various factors supported by user device 120 or by anyother device of a user of device 120, such as a mobile phone or wearabledevice of the user. These supported authentication factors include:biometric identifiers, PINs, passwords, one or more computing devicesco-located with user device 120, a geographic location of device 120,ambient noise relative to device 120, applications downloaded or runningon device 120, etc.

Based on a security level 140 selected by security module 130, computersystem 110 initiates verification of the subset of authenticationfactors 142 corresponding to the selected security level for request122. Verification of authentication factors is discussed in furtherdetail below with reference to FIGS. 2-4. If computer system 110 is ableto successfully verify the subset of authentication factors, then thissystem 110 executes database commend 114 based on request 122 ondatabase 150. That is, if the appropriate authentication factors areverified for a request 122, then system 110 authorizes the databaseoperation specified in this request.

In some embodiments, any of various systems other than computer system110 perform the database operation on data stored in database 150. Forexample, computer system 110 makes an authorization decision andprovides this decision to another system configured to performoperations on database 150. In such situations, computer system 110 is asecurity server that interacts with user devices, but may not interfacewith database 150.

In this disclosure, various “modules” operable to perform designatedfunctions are shown in the figures and described in detail above (e.g.,security module 130, comparison module 160, etc.). As used herein, a“module” refers to software or hardware that is operable to perform aspecified set of operations. A module may refer to a set of softwareinstructions that are executable by a computer system to perform the setof operations. A module may also refer to hardware that is configured toperform the set of operations. A hardware module may constitutegeneral-purpose hardware as well as a non-transitory computer-readablemedium that stores program instructions, or specialized hardware such asa customized ASIC. Accordingly, a module that is described as being“executable” to perform operations refers to a software module, while amodule that is described as being “configured” to perform operationsrefers to a hardware module. A module that is described as “operable” toperform operations refers to a software module, a hardware module, orsome combination thereof. Further, for any discussion herein that refersto a module that is “executable” to perform certain operations, it is tobe understood that those operations may be implemented, in otherembodiments, by a hardware module “configured” to perform theoperations, and vice versa.

The disclosed customized multi-factor authentication techniques fordetermining whether to authorize a requested database operation mayadvantageously draw the attention of individuals submitting theserequests to important details of the requests. This may reduce liabilityissues and risks associated with such requests. For example, if anindividual mistakenly submits a request to irreversibly delete data in aproduction environment, but the disclosed system sends an authorizationmessage to this individual informing them of their requested deletion,this enables the user to reverse their request prior to the data beinglost (i.e., deleted). In addition, authorization messages may be sent toa manager of the individual submitting the request, thereby providingfurther checks and balances for this deletion request.

In other situations, the disclosed security level selection techniquesmay reduce a number of authentication factors necessary forauthorization of a requested database operation. For example, if arequested database operation is determined to be low risk, then lessauthentication factors may require verification prior to authorizingthis request. This may free up computing resources (e.g., of anauthentication server) as well as reduce number of authenticationfactors that individuals need to supply, which will reduce the latencyof data management by decreasing the amount of time necessary toauthorize database requests. In addition, the disclosed techniques mayreduce the number of authentication factors that require user input whenenough contextual information is available to automatically verifyauthentication factors for the request (i.e., without user input). Suchtechniques may save users time and frustration, while still maintainingthe same level of security.

Example Authorization Request

FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating an example method for determiningwhether to authorize a database operation request. In the illustratedembodiment, method 200 includes several elements performed byauthentication system 210 and a couple elements performed by user device220. Authorization system 210 is one example of computer system 110. Themethod shown in FIG. 2, however, may be used in conjunction with any ofthe computer circuitry, systems, devices, elements, or componentsdisclosed herein, among other devices. In various embodiments, some ofthe method elements shown may be performed concurrently, in a differentorder than shown, or may be omitted. Additional method elements may alsobe performed as desired.

At element 212, in the illustrated embodiment, authentication system 210receives a request to perform a database operation. This databaseoperation request is received from a computing device associated with aparticular user. For example, this request may be received from userdevice 120. As discussed above, this database operation could be any ofvarious types of operations to be performed on any of various types ofdata. As one specific example, the requested database operation mayspecify to archive a set of temperature readings for a plurality ofemployees of a company that are older than two weeks in order to complywith regulations for private user data (e.g., general data protectionregulation (GDPR), trusted third party auditor (TTPA), etc.). In orderto ensure that the correct temperature data is archived (which may be anirreversible process), authentication system 210 proceeds withperforming the disclosed security techniques.

At 214, authentication system 210 compares contextual information forthe database operation with contextual information for prior databaseoperation requests. As discussed above, authentication system 210attempts to determine whether similar database operations have beenrequested by this (or other) users in the past. For example, if aparticular user submits a data archive request every Friday at 5 PM foremployee temperature data from the same device (e.g., their work desktopcomputer), then authentication system 210 will recognize that thisdatabase operation is low risk due to it being a regularly scheduledoperation that has been authorized in the past (e.g., this request wasnot submitted by mistake or malintent).

At 218, authentication system 210 selects, based on the comparison at214, a security level that requires a particular subset of a set ofsupported authentication factors. Continuing with the example describedin the paragraph above, based on the requested database operation beinga regularly requested and regularly authorized operation, authenticationsystem 210 may select a security level that does not require input fromany users for authentication factors. For example, the selected securitylevel may automate verification of its required set of authenticationfactors. In some instances, this may be by way of verifying passiveauthentication factors such as a geolocation of the requesting user'smobile device or BLUETOOTH signals of devices located near therequesting user's mobile device.

Consider a situation in which a user submits a request to alter a set ofdata when they are under duress. That is, this user is not in a stableemotional state (and, thus, may be thinking irrationally) when theysubmit a request e.g., to delete data. As such, the disclosed securitysystem considers users' emotional state when determining whether toauthorize their requested database operations. In some embodiments,authentication system 210 revokes a user's access to a set of data basedon a selected security level. For example, the contextual informationfor a database operation request includes data recorded by a heart ratemonitor and a pulse oximeter for a user submitting the databaseoperation request. This information might indicate a perceived emotionalstate of the user (e.g., that the user is under duress). This user mightbe wearing a wearable device such as a smart watch that includes a heartrate monitor and pulse oximeter. Using the data collected by this user'swearable device, the authentication system 210 selects a security levelwhich requires that this user's access rights must be revoked eithertemporarily or until an emotional state threshold has been met. Forexample, the system might determine that this user has calmed down andis, therefore, choosing to perform database operations from a rationalstate of mind. In some embodiments, revoking a user's access rights isperformed for a predetermined amount of time specified in the selectedsecurity level.

In some embodiments, the security level is selected based on the user'sheart rate or blood pressure, or both, being above a threshold. Forexample, if a user's heart rate and blood pressure are elevated athreshold amount above an expected baseline (e.g., this user isassociated with a baseline heart rate and blood pressure according totheir biomarker history), then authentication system 210 selects from aset of security levels based on the amount that the user's biomarkershave surpassed the baseline.

In some embodiments, security levels in the set of security levelsrequire that the access rights of a user be suspended varying amounts oftime. As a first example, a first security level requires that a user'saccess rights be revoked for five minutes based on their heart rate andblood pressure being slightly above an expected baseline. As a secondexample, a second security level requires that a user's access rights berevoked for an hour based on their heart rate and blood pressuresurpassing the expected baseline by a much greater amount than theuser's heart rate and blood pressure in the first example. As yetanother example, a third security level might require a user's accessrights to be suspended until their heart rate and blood pressure returnto the expected baseline (e.g., which might be a couple minutes later orseveral hours later). In some embodiments, a selected security levelmight specify that, even though a user's heart rate and blood pressureare above a baseline, this user's request should be authorized based onother contextual information for the database operation requestindicating that this is a secure request (e.g., this is a habitualrequest). For example, if a user makes the same delete request from thesame location and same device once a week but has an elevated heart rateor blood pressure, or both, the authentication system 210 might stillauthorize the request based on it being a habitual request.

At 222, authentication system 210 verifies factors required by theselected security level. In some embodiments, verification of anauthentication factor includes obtaining biometric information from auser requesting the database operation (e.g., a user of device 120).

At 224, authentication system transmits, to a device 220 of the userrequesting the database operation, an authorization request for thedatabase operation, where the authorization request includes contextualinformation for the request. In some embodiments, the authorizationrequest is sent as a factor required by the selected security level. Forexample, in order to authorize the requested database operation,authentication system first obtains authorization from the user whooriginally requested the operation. In this example, the authorizationrequest sent at 224 is a factor in a subset of factors required by theselected security levels.

In some embodiments, the device of the user requesting the databaseoperation is user device 220. In other embodiments, the device used tosubmit the request is a device other than user device 220. This otherdevice is also associated with the user of device 220. Said another way,user device 120 and user device 220 may not be the same computingdevice. For example, user device 120 may be a desktop work computer ofthe user submitting the database operation request, while user device220 may be a mobile phone of this same user.

The authorization request sent at 224 may be displayed on a userinterface of user device 220, for example, with different pieces ofcontextual information for the requested database operation. Note thatthe authorization request sent to user device 220 is sent via adifferent communication channel than the communication channel used byauthentication system 210 to communicate with user device 110, forexample. As such, the communication between authentication system 210and user device 220 may be referred to as out-of-band communication.

In some embodiments, system 210 sends a second authorization request toa device associated with another user (i.e., not device 220). Forexample, the second authorization request may be sent to a manager ofthe user of device 220 or an administrator of the database systemstoring data specified in the requested database operation, or both.This second authorization request may specify a different set ofcontextual information than the information specified in the firstauthorization request sent to device 220. For example, the secondrequest may specify an identifier of the user that requested thedatabase operation as well as a device from which the request wasinitiated. In this example, the second authorization request is anadditional factor in the subset of authentication factors required bythe security level selected at 218. Authentication system 210 may sendout a plurality of authorization requests to different individualsassociated with differing degrees of authority.

Unlike data deletion requests, which limit the accessibility of thisdata to users, requests to restore or reconstruct data may requirespecific instructions clarifying who has access rights to the data thatis being added back into the system. In some embodiments, theauthorization request transmitted at 224 includes a request for dataaccess instructions. For example, if the database operation request is areconstruction, restoration, or replacement request, the authorizationrequest sent to the user's device may ask the user to clarify whichindividuals have access to the reconstructed, restored, or replaceddata. This may advantageously improve the security of this data bypreventing unauthorized users from accessing this data when it is firstreconstructed, restored, or replaced in the database (e.g., database150).

At 202, user device 220 verifies contextual information provided in theauthorization request. The user is able to see important details for thedatabase operation they requested, such as a time the request was made,a set of data to be queried, an environment of the data (e.g.,production), a type of operation to be performed (e.g., archive), etc.One or more of these pieces of information may be displayed incombination with the authorization request to the user via an interfaceof user device 220.

At 204, the user of user device 220 confirms authorization of thedatabase request. For example, a user of device 220 may click a buttondisplayed via a user interface of their device that confirmsauthorization of the database operation. User device 220 then transmitsthis confirmation to authentication system 210.

At 226, authentication system 210 executes the authorized databaseoperation. For example, authentication system 210 may mask a set ofquery data in a test environment such that various developers workingwith this data are unable to see the true nature of the data. As onespecific example, a set of data that includes personally identifiableinformation (PII) of actors and actresses needs to be kept confidential.In general, PII includes any personal information of an individual suchas legal names, phone numbers, addresses, financial information, etc. Inorder to keep this information confidential, it is necessary to alterthe names of these actors and actresses (i.e., using pseudonyms). Inthis example, the authorized database operation specifies the set ofactor/actress information to be altered as well as pseudonyms for theseindividuals.

In some embodiments, authentication system 210 analyzes contextualinformation 164 collected for various database operation requests.Authentication system 210 is used in such scenarios to streamline datacollection and processing in a central database. The processed andanalyzed information can then be used to provide a useful summary toindividual entities or users in addition to being used for determiningwhether to authorized various database operation requests. For example,the contextual information may be used for: contact tracing (e.g., totrack the spread of diseases), supply chain management (e.g., foodsupplies for restaurants), traffic control (e.g., certain roads gethigher levels of traffic than others), etc. As one specific example,based on analyzing contextual information for various users,authentication system 210 may send a particular user a notificationinforming them that they have been in the same location as an individualwho has tested positive for a contagious virus. In this example,authentication system 210 determines that the particular user spent acertain amount of time in the same location as the positive individualbased on global positioning system (GPS), WiFi, cellular tower,BLUETOOTH, near field communication (NFC), etc. data collected from boththe particular individual's device(s) and the positive individual'sdevice(s). Further, in this example, the authentication system 210generates a model representing an exposure map from the contextualinformation for the particular user relative to various locations theyhave visited e.g., in the past 24 hours, such that this user is able toassess their potential level of exposure to a disease. Customized modelsmay be provided to various users based on their particular contextualinformation over a given period of time.

Example Security Level Selection

FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating an example computer systemconfigured to select a security level for a requested database operationusing a machine learning model. In the illustrated embodiment, system300 includes computer system 310 and a mobile device 360 which includeserver-side authenticator application 314 and client-side authenticatorapplication 312, respectively. System 300 also includes other userdevice 370 and user 308.

Client-side authenticator application 312 sends current contextualinformation 322 for a database operation requested by a user (e.g., auser of device 120) to server-side authenticator application 314. Insome embodiments, mobile device 360 is the same as user device 120. Inother embodiments, these two devices are different devices of the sameuser. For example, user 308 is a user of user device 120 that sends thedatabase operation request, while the mobile device 360 of this sameuser provides the necessary contextual information for this request. Inthe illustrated embodiment, client-side authenticator application 312interacts with server-side authenticator application 314 forauthorization of a requested database operation. Note that server-sideauthenticator application 314 may be an application programminginterface (API) that interacts with a webservice relying on a responsefrom the client application (i.e., application 312).

Server-side authenticator application 314, in the illustratedembodiment, includes a machine learning model 330. In some embodiments,application 314 trains machine learning model 330 using prior contextualinformation for various prior database operation requests from differentusers (e.g., user 308 of devices 120 and 360, users of other devices,etc.). In other embodiments, machine learning model 330 is provided toapplication 314 from another system configured to train models usingmachine learning techniques. Application 314 may use any of varioustraining techniques to train model 330, including supervised,unsupervised, semi-supervised, etc. Machine learning model 330 may beany of various types of machine learning models includes neural network,linear regression, decision tree, Naïve Bayes, K-means, K-nearestneighbor (KNN), random forest, gradient boosting algorithm, etc.

In order to train machine learning model 330, server-side authenticatorapplication 314 assigns labels to database operation requests associatedwith different sets of prior contextual information. These labelsindicate different security levels that are selected for databaseoperation requests. These database operation requests are then usable totrain a machine learning model to predict security levels for databaseoperation requests based on contextual information. That is, a machinelearning model learns patterns in contextual information indicatingwhether a database operation request is risky or not.

In some embodiments, machine learning model 330 is implemented byclient-side authenticator application 312 of mobile device 360. In thisscenario, client-side authenticator application 312 inputs contextualinformation 322 collected from its environment in response to mobiledevice 360 receiving an indication of a database operation request fromuser device 120. In some embodiments, mobile device 360 receives atrained version of machine learning model 330 from another systemconfigured to train models using machine learning techniques. In otherembodiments, mobile device 360 trains machine learning model 330 usingcontextual information collected by device 360 for prior databaseoperation requests. Mobile device 360 inputs current contextualinformation into the trained machine learning model to determine apredicted security level to be used to authenticate a database operationrequest. Mobile device 360 then provides this predicted security levelto server-side authenticator application 314 for initiation of thesubset of authentication factors required by the predicted securitylevel.

Server-side authenticator application 314, in the illustratedembodiment, sends one or more authentication factors 332A to client-sideauthenticator application 312 based on the subset of authenticationfactors required by the security level output by machine learning model330. In some embodiments, factor(s) 332A require input from user 308(e.g., a PIN, biometric identifier, etc.). In other embodiments,factor(s) 332A do not require input from user 308. For example, thesefactor(s) 332A may be passive factors that are verified based oncontextual information such as mobile device 360 being located in aparticular geofenced area. As discussed in U.S. patent application Ser.No. 16/025,885 (Pub. No. 2020/0007532) titled Automating Responses toAuthentication Requests Using Unsupervised Computer Learning Techniques,in some embodiments a user device (e.g., mobile device 360) mayautomatically respond to requests for one or more authentication factors(e.g., factors 332A) using unsupervised computer learning techniques.

Server-side authenticator application 314 also sends an authorizationrequest 334 to client-side authenticator application 312. Thisauthorization request is a factor in the subset of authenticationfactors required by the security level output by machine learning model330. Client-side authenticator application 312, in the illustratedembodiment, causes display of authorization request 334 with currentcontextual information 322 via user interface 340. In this scenario,application 312 causes user interface 340 to display the authorizationrequest to user 308. User 308, in the illustrated embodiment, providesan authorization decision 306 to mobile device 360 via user interface340. For example, user 308 may click on a button that says “authorizerequest.” Client-side authenticator application 312 then sends a messageto server-side authenticator application 314 indicating whether user 308authorized the requested database operation or not.

Other user device 370, in the illustrated embodiment, receives one ormore authentication factors 332B from application 314. In someembodiments, these factor(s) 332B include a second authorization requestwith contextual information. In this situation, other user device 370displays an authorization request via a user interface with contextualinformation to a user of device 370. These authentication factor(s) 332Bmay also include requests for other types of input from the user ofdevice 370 such as a password, PIN, biometric information, etc. Notethat other user device 370 may be associated with a user that did notrequest the database operation such as the manager of the requestinguser or a system administrator associated with the set of query dataspecified in the database operation request.

If user 308 and a user of device 370 both authorize the databaseoperation request and if the authentication factor(s) 332A are verified,computer system 310 either executes the requested database operation orsends a confirmation message to another system configured to execute therequested operation. That is, if all authentication factors required bythe security level determined by machine learning model 330 areverified, then computer system 310 authorizes the database operationrequest (e.g., request 122).

Note that various examples herein discuss example authentication factorsthat may be verified, but these examples are discussed for purposes ofexplanation and are not intended to limit the scope of the presentdisclosure. In other embodiments, any of various types of authenticationfactors may be verified during a multi-factor authentication processe.g., for authorization of requested database operations.

Example Contextual Information

FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating example contextual information.In the illustrated embodiment, system 400 includes computer system 110,user device 120, mobile device 460, and nearby computing devices 425.

User device 120, in the illustrated embodiment, transmits geolocationinformation 402 and an internet protocol (IP) address 404 to computersystem 110. Device 120 is a device from which a user submitted thedatabase operation request 122 as shown in FIG. 1. In the illustratedembodiment, user device 120 measures BLUETOOTH signals 408 from one ormore nearby computing devices 425. In some embodiments, device 120measures various Wi-Fi signals in addition to BLUETOOTH signals. Userdevice 120 may then transmit these measured signals 408 (and Wi-Fisignals) to computer system 110 to be used as contextual information fordatabase operation request 122. These nearby devices 425 may be desktopcomputers or mobile devices, or both of coworkers of the user of device120, for example. These nearby computing devices 425 may be any ofvarious types of “smart” devices that include BLUETOOTH capabilities.

User device 120 records ambient noise 406 from its surroundingenvironment. User device 120 may then send the recorded ambient noise406 to computer system 110. This ambient noise 406 may include thingssuch as sounds from cars, birds, devices (cell phone ringer orvibration, a printer, etc.), music, voices, white noise, etc. occurringin the proximity to device 120.

Mobile device 460, in the illustrated embodiment, provides biometricinformation 462 and information 464 specifying one or more applicationsthat are downloaded and running on mobile device 460 to computer system110. For example, a user of device 460 may provide a fingerprint or facescan in response to a request from computer system 110 for biometricidentifier(s) as factors in a multi-factor authentication procedure.Mobile device 460 may be a cell phone of the user who submitted databaseoperation request 122, for example. In some embodiments, mobile device460 also sends an IP address to computer system 110.

In some embodiments, mobile device 460 measures geolocation information402, ambient noise 406, and BLUETOOTH signals 408 for user device 120.For example, user device 120 may be a desktop computer of a user. At thetime this user requests a database operation, they also have their cellphone (e.g., mobile device 460) on their desk next to device 120. Inthis example, the user's cell phone is able to collect contextualinformation for a database operation request submitted by this user andthen provide the contextual information to computer system 110. This maybe useful in situations in which user device 120 is not configured tocollect various contextual information (e.g., device 120 does notinclude a microphone to collect ambient noise 406).

As discussed above with reference to FIG. 1, computer system 110 selectsa security level for a database operation request 122 based on comparingcontextual information 162 with contextual information for priorrequests (from the same or different devices). As one specific exampleof security level selection, if at least four out of five pieces ofcontextual information for a current request match contextualinformation for a prior request submitted by the same user as thecurrent request, computer system selects a security level that requiresverification of a single authentication factor.

As another specific example, if contextual information for a currentrequest and a prior request from the same user match (e.g., six out ofsix pieces of information are the same), computer system 110 mayautomatically authorize the requested database operation, e.g., withoutrequiring input from the user submitting the request. Further, considera situation in which only two out of six pieces of contextualinformation are the same for a current and prior database operationrequest. In this situation, computer system 110 selects a security levelthat requires sending a first factor in the form of an authorizationrequest to the requesting user in addition to sending a second factor tothe requesting user's mobile device (e.g., requesting one or morebiometric identifiers).

As yet another example, computer system 110 may determine that none ofthe current contextual information matches prior requests for aparticular user. In this example, computer system 110 selects a securitylevel that requires two different authorization requests to be sente.g., one to the requesting user and one to the requesting user'smanager as well as at least one other authentication factor. This atleast one other factor may be a request for a PIN from the requestinguser, for example. In some embodiments, computer system 110 comparescontextual information for a current database operation request withcontextual information associated with prior requests submitted bydifferent users. In such situations, computer system 110 may selectsecurity levels associated with higher security relative to othersecurity levels.

Example Methods

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for determining whetherto authorize a requested database operation based on verification of asubset of authentication factors required by a selected security level,according to some embodiments. The method shown in FIG. 5 may be used inconjunction with any of the computer circuitry, systems, devices,elements, or components disclosed herein, among other devices. Invarious embodiments, some of the method elements shown may be performedconcurrently, in a different order than shown, or may be omitted.Additional method elements may also be performed as desired. Method 500may be performed by computer system 110, for example.

At 510, in the illustrated embodiment, a computer system receives adatabase operation request that specifies a set of query data, where thecomputer system supports multiple different security levels that requiredifferent subsets of a set of authentication factors supported by aknown device of a user associated with the user device. In someembodiments, the subset of authentication factors includes a factor thatinvolves a display, generated via an authenticator application, of anotification and a request for verification to a user associated withthe database operation request. The authenticator application may bedownloaded on a device of the user requesting the database operation,such as a smartphone and may display the notification via the smartphonescreen. In other embodiments, this notification is displayed via therequesting user's desktop computer.

In some embodiments, the supported set of authentication factorsincludes one or more of the following types of authentication factors: abiometric identifier, a personal identification number (PIN), apassword, one or more computing devices within the same geolocation asthe user device, a geolocation of the user device, ambient noiserelative to the user device, and one or more applications downloaded onthe user device.

At 520, the computer system determines current contextual informationfor the database operation request, where the current contextualinformation includes an indication of the set of query data. In otherembodiments a device of the user associated with the database operationrequest determines the current contextual information. For example, thisuser's mobile device may determine contextual information for therequest, even in situations in which the request was not submitted fromthe user's mobile device. In some embodiments, the contextualinformation includes one or more of the following types of informationfor the database operation request: an identifier of the user submittingthe request, a set of data indicated in the request, an organization ofthe user submitting the request, an identifier of the user device, atimestamp of the request, and a geolocation of the user device at thetime of the request.

At 530, the computer system compares the current contextual informationwith prior contextual information for database requests. In someembodiments, the contextual information includes information associatedwith the database operation request and information associated with theuser device. In some embodiments, a device of the user (e.g., userdevice 120) requesting the database operation performs element 530 viaan authenticator application (e.g., client-side authenticatorapplication 312). For example, application 312 may compare currentcontextual information with contextual information for databaseoperation requests submitted by this same user previously (e.g.,application 312 may store prior contextual information for thispurpose).

At 540, the computer system selects, based on the comparing, a securitylevel from the multiple different security levels. In some embodiments,the computer system transmits, to a computing device associated withanother user, an authorization request for the database operation, wherethe transmitting is performed based on the selected security level, andwhere the authorization request includes at least a portion of thecurrent contextual information. The computing device associated withanother user may be other user device 370 shown in FIG. 3, for example.

In some embodiments, the security level is further selected based on atype of data accessed by the requested database operation and a type ofoperation indicated in the contextual information. For example, the typeof data included in the set of query data may be archived data and thetype of operation indicated in the contextual information may be a datarestore operation

In some embodiments, the known device of the user and the user deviceare the same. For example, a user may submit a database operationrequest from their cell phone and the computer system may send anauthorization request for the database operation to this user's cellphone rather than to one of their other devices, such as a workcomputer. In this example, the user has an authenticator applicationdownloaded on their cell phone. This application communicates withcomputer system to present a notification to the requesting user viatheir cell phone's screen in order to obtain authorization from the userfor the database operation they requested.

At 550, the computer system initiates, based on the selected securitylevel, verification of a corresponding subset of authentication factors.In some embodiments, the selected security level automates verificationof its subset of authentication factors and does not require input fromthe user for authentication factors. For example, based on the selectedsecurity level, computer system 110 verifies one or more passiveauthentication factors (e.g., a location of the requesting user's mobiledevice or known devices being in proximity to the user's mobile devicebased on BLUETOOTH signals). The computer system 110 then automaticallyapproves the requested database operation based on these factors withoutrequiring user input.

At 560, the computer system determines, based on whether the subset ofauthentication factors is verified, whether to authorize the requesteddatabase operation. In some embodiments, the computer system performs,based on determining to authorize the database operation, the databaseoperation.

FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for determining a subsetof authentication factors to verify for a requested database operationrequest using machine learning techniques, according to someembodiments. The method shown in FIG. 6 may be used in conjunction withany of the computer circuitry, systems, devices, elements, or componentsdisclosed herein, among other devices. In various embodiments, some ofthe method elements shown may be performed concurrently, in a differentorder than shown, or may be omitted. Additional method elements may alsobe performed as desired. Method 600 may be performed by computer system310, for example.

At 610, in the illustrated embodiment, a computer system receives, froma user device, a database operation request that specifies a set ofquery data. The set of query data is data stored in a database that theuser wishes to alter in some way (e.g., delete, add to, mask etc.).

At 620, the computer system determines current contextual informationfor the database operation request, where the current contextualinformation includes an indication of the set of query data. In otherembodiments, a user device (e.g., user device 120 or mobile device 360)determines the current contextual information for the database operationrequest. For example, the user device may determine this informationbased on its environment and then transmit this information to thecomputer system for comparison with prior contextual information forvarious other database operation requests. In some embodiments, thecurrent contextual information further includes an indication that thedatabase operation is a data masking operation for the set of query dataand that the set of query data is stored in a non-productionenvironment.

At 630, the computer system inputs, into a machine learning modeltrained using contextual information from a plurality of prior databaserequests, the current contextual information. The machine learning modelmay be a machine learning classifier, for example. Specifically, thisclassifier may output various different classifications for databaseoperation requests that specify different security levels to beimplemented for these requests.

At 640, the computer system initiates, based on output of the machinelearning model, a security level from a plurality of different securitylevels that requires verification of a particular subset ofauthentication factors supported by a known device of a user associatedwith the user device. In some embodiments, the particular subset ofauthentication factors includes a factor that involves a display,generated via an authenticator application, of a notification and arequest for verification to a user associated with the databaseoperation request, and where the authenticator application transmits thenotification and request for display via an out-of-band mechanism.

At 650, the computer system determines, based on whether the subset ofauthentication factors is verified, whether to authorize the databaseoperation. For example, if all of the authentication factors areverified, the system executes the database operation.

Example Computing Device

Turning now to FIG. 7, a block diagram of one embodiment of computingdevice (which may also be referred to as a computing system) 710 isdepicted. Computing device 710 may be used to implement various portionsof this disclosure. Computing device 710 may be any suitable type ofdevice, including, but not limited to, a personal computer system (e.g.,mobile device 360), desktop computer (e.g., other user device 370),laptop or notebook computer, mainframe computer system, web server,workstation, or network computer (e.g., computer system 110). As shown,computing device 710 includes processing unit 750, storage 712, andinput/output (I/O) interface 730 coupled via an interconnect 760 (e.g.,a system bus). I/O interface 730 may be coupled to one or more I/Odevices 740. Computing device 710 further includes network interface732, which may be coupled to network 720 for communications with, forexample, other computing devices.

In various embodiments, processing unit 750 includes one or moreprocessors. In some embodiments, processing unit 750 includes one ormore coprocessor units. In some embodiments, multiple instances ofprocessing unit 750 may be coupled to interconnect 760. Processing unit750 (or each processor within 750) may contain a cache or other form ofon-board memory. In some embodiments, processing unit 750 may beimplemented as a general-purpose processing unit, and in otherembodiments it may be implemented as a special purpose processing unit(e.g., an ASIC). In general, computing device 710 is not limited to anyparticular type of processing unit or processor subsystem.

Storage subsystem 712 is usable by processing unit 750 (e.g., to storeinstructions executable by and data used by processing unit 750).Storage subsystem 712 may be implemented by any suitable type ofphysical memory media, including hard disk storage, floppy disk storage,removable disk storage, flash memory, random access memory (RAM-SRAM,EDO RAM, SDRAM, DDR SDRAM, RDRAM, etc.), ROM (PROM, EEPROM, etc.), andso on. Storage subsystem 712 may consist solely of volatile memory, inone embodiment. Storage subsystem 712 may store program instructionsexecutable by computing device 710 using processing unit 750, includingprogram instructions executable to cause computing device 710 toimplement the various techniques disclosed herein.

I/O interface 730 may represent one or more interfaces and may be any ofvarious types of interfaces configured to couple to and communicate withother devices, according to various embodiments. In one embodiment, I/Ointerface 730 is a bridge chip from a front-side to one or moreback-side buses. I/O interface 730 may be coupled to one or more I/Odevices 740 via one or more corresponding buses or other interfaces.Examples of I/O devices include storage devices (hard disk, opticaldrive, removable flash drive, storage array, SAN, or an associatedcontroller), network interface devices, user interface devices or otherdevices (e.g., graphics, sound, etc.).

Various articles of manufacture that store instructions (and,optionally, data) executable by a computing system to implementtechniques disclosed herein are also contemplated. The computing systemmay execute the instructions using one or more processing elements. Thearticles of manufacture include non-transitory computer-readable memorymedia. The contemplated non-transitory computer-readable memory mediainclude portions of a memory subsystem of a computing device as well asstorage media or memory media such as magnetic media (e.g., disk) oroptical media (e.g., CD, DVD, and related technologies, etc.). Thenon-transitory computer-readable media may be either volatile ornonvolatile memory.

The present disclosure includes references to “embodiments,” which arenon-limiting implementations of the disclosed concepts. References to“an embodiment,” “one embodiment,” “a particular embodiment,” “someembodiments,” “various embodiments,” and the like do not necessarilyrefer to the same embodiment. A large number of possible embodiments arecontemplated, including specific embodiments described in detail, aswell as modifications or alternatives that fall within the spirit orscope of the disclosure. Not all embodiments will necessarily manifestany or all of the potential advantages described herein.

Unless stated otherwise, the specific embodiments are not intended tolimit the scope of claims that are drafted based on this disclosure tothe disclosed forms, even where only a single example is described withrespect to a particular feature. The disclosed embodiments are thusintended to be illustrative rather than restrictive, absent anystatements to the contrary. The application is intended to cover suchalternatives, modifications, and equivalents that would be apparent to aperson skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.

Particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined inany suitable manner consistent with this disclosure. The disclosure isthus intended to include any feature or combination of featuresdisclosed herein (either explicitly or implicitly), or anygeneralization thereof. Accordingly, new claims may be formulated duringprosecution of this application (or an application claiming prioritythereto) to any such combination of features. In particular, withreference to the appended claims, features from dependent claims may becombined with those of the independent claims and features fromrespective independent claims may be combined in any appropriate mannerand not merely in the specific combinations enumerated in the appendedclaims.

For example, while the appended dependent claims are drafted such thateach depends on a single other claim, additional dependencies are alsocontemplated, including the following: Claim 3 (could depend from any ofclaims 1-2); claim 4 (any preceding claim); claim 5 (claim 4), etc.Where appropriate, it is also contemplated that claims drafted in onestatutory type (e.g., apparatus) suggest corresponding claims of anotherstatutory type (e.g., method).

Because this disclosure is a legal document, various terms and phrasesmay be subject to administrative and judicial interpretation. Publicnotice is hereby given that the following paragraphs, as well asdefinitions provided throughout the disclosure, are to be used indetermining how to interpret claims that are drafted based on thisdisclosure.

References to the singular forms such “a,” “an,” and “the” are intendedto mean “one or more” unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.Reference to “an item” in a claim thus does not preclude additionalinstances of the item.

The word “may” is used herein in a permissive sense (i.e., having thepotential to, being able to) and not in a mandatory sense (i.e., must).

The terms “comprising” and “including,” and forms thereof, areopen-ended and mean “including, but not limited to.”

When the term “or” is used in this disclosure with respect to a list ofoptions, it will generally be understood to be used in the inclusivesense unless the context provides otherwise. Thus, a recitation of “x ory” is equivalent to “x or y, or both,” covering x but not y, y but notx, and both x and y. On the hand, a phrase such as “either x or y, butnot both” makes clear that “or” is being used in the exclusive sense.

A recitation of “w, x, y, or z, or any combination thereof” or “at leastone of . . . w, x, y, and z” is intended to cover all possibilitiesinvolving a single element up to the total number of elements in theset. For example, given the set [w, x, y, z], these phrasings cover anysingle element of the set (e.g., w but not x, y, or z), any two elements(e.g., w and x, but not y or z), any three elements (e.g., w, x, and y,but not z), and all four elements. The phrase “at least one of . . . w,x, y, and z” thus refers to at least one of element of the set [w, x, y,z], thereby covering all possible combinations in this list of options.This phrase is not to be interpreted to require that there is at leastone instance of w, at least one instance of x, at least one instance ofy, and at least one instance of z.

Various “labels” may proceed nouns in this disclosure. Unless contextprovides otherwise, different labels used for a feature (e.g., “firstcircuit,” “second circuit,” “particular circuit,” “given circuit,” etc.)refer to different instances of the feature. The labels “first,”“second,” and “third” when applied to a particular feature do not implyany type of ordering (e.g., spatial, temporal, logical, etc.), unlessstated otherwise.

Within this disclosure, different entities (which may variously bereferred to as “units,” “circuits,” other components, etc.) may bedescribed or claimed as “configured” to perform one or more tasks oroperations. This formulation—[entity] configured to [perform one or moretasks]—is used herein to refer to structure (i.e., something physical).More specifically, this formulation is used to indicate that thisstructure is arranged to perform the one or more tasks during operation.A structure can be said to be “configured to” perform some task even ifthe structure is not currently being operated. Thus, an entity describedor recited as “configured to” perform some task refers to somethingphysical, such as a device, circuit, memory storing program instructionsexecutable to implement the task, etc. This phrase is not used herein torefer to something intangible.

The term “configured to” is not intended to mean “configurable to.” Anunprogrammed FPGA, for example, would not be considered to be“configured to” perform some specific function. This unprogrammed FPGAmay be “configurable to” perform that function, however.

Reciting in the appended claims that a structure is “configured to”perform one or more tasks is expressly intended not to invoke 35 U.S.C.§ 112(f) for that claim element. Should Applicant wish to invoke Section112(f) during prosecution, it will recite claim elements using the“means for” [performing a function] construct.

The phrase “based on” is used to describe one or more factors thataffect a determination. This term does not foreclose the possibilitythat additional factors may affect the determination. That is, adetermination may be solely based on specified factors or based on thespecified factors as well as other, unspecified factors. Consider thephrase “determine A based on B.” This phrase specifies that B is afactor that is used to determine A or that affects the determination ofA. This phrase does not foreclose that the determination of A may alsobe based on some other factor, such as C. This phrase is also intendedto cover an embodiment in which A is determined based solely on B. Asused herein, the phrase “based on” is synonymous with the phrase “basedat least in part on.”

The phrase “in response to” describes one or more factors that triggeran effect. This phrase does not foreclose the possibility thatadditional factors may affect or otherwise trigger the effect. That is,an effect may be solely in response to those factors, or may be inresponse to the specified factors as well as other, unspecified factors.Consider the phrase “perform A in response to B.” This phrase specifiesthat B is a factor that triggers the performance of A. This phrase doesnot foreclose that performing A may also be in response to some otherfactor, such as C. This phrase is also intended to cover an embodimentin which A is performed solely in response to B.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method, comprising: receiving, by a computersystem from a user device, a database operation request that specifies aset of query data, wherein the computer system supports multipledifferent security levels that require different subsets of a set ofauthentication factors supported by a known device of a user associatedwith the user device; determining current contextual information for thedatabase operation request, wherein the current contextual informationincludes an indication of the set of query data; comparing, by thecomputer system, the current contextual information with priorcontextual information for database requests; selecting, by the computersystem based on the comparing, a security level from the multipledifferent security levels; initiating, by the computer system based onthe selected security level, verification of a corresponding subset ofauthentication factors; and determining, by the computer system based onwhether the subset of authentication factors is verified, whether toauthorize the requested database operation.
 2. The method of claim 1,wherein the subset of authentication factors includes a factor thatinvolves a display, generated via an authenticator application, of anotification and a request for verification to a user associated withthe database operation request.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein thenotification specifies at least a portion of the current contextualinformation, and wherein the set of query data included in the currentcontextual information indicates a type of data upon which databaseoperation is to be performed.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein theselected security level automates verification of its subset ofauthentication factors and does not require input from the user forauthentication factors.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the contextualinformation includes information associated with the database operationrequest and information associated with the user device.
 6. The methodof claim 1, further comprising: transmitting, by the computer system toa computing device associated with another user, an authorizationrequest for the database operation, wherein the transmitting isperformed based on the selected security level, and wherein theauthorization request includes at least a portion of the currentcontextual information.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the knowndevice of the user and the user device are the same.
 8. The method ofclaim 1, further comprising: performing, by the computer system based ondetermining to authorize the database operation, the database operation.9. The method of claim 1, wherein the supported set of authenticationfactors includes one or more of the following types of authenticationfactors: a biometric identifier, a personal identification number (PIN),a password, one or more computing devices within the same geolocation asthe user device, a geolocation of the user device, ambient noiserelative to the user device, and one or more applications downloaded onthe user device.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the contextualinformation includes one or more of the following types of informationfor the database operation request: an identifier of the user submittingthe request, a set of data indicated in the request, an organization ofthe user submitting the request, an identifier of the user device, atimestamp of the request, and a geolocation of the user device at thetime of the request.
 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the securitylevel is further selected based on a type of data included in the set ofquery data and a type of operation indicated in the contextualinformation.
 12. A non-transitory computer-readable medium havinginstructions stored thereon that are executable by a computing device toperform operations comprising: receiving, from a user device, a databaseoperation request that specifies a set of query data, wherein thecomputer system supports multiple different security levels that requiredifferent subsets of a set of authentication factors supported by aknown device of a user associated with the user device; determiningcurrent contextual information for the database operation request,wherein the current contextual information includes an indication of anenvironment of the user device; comparing the current contextualinformation with prior contextual information for database requests;selecting, based on the comparing, a security level from the multipledifferent security levels; initiating, based on the selected securitylevel, verification of a corresponding subset of authentication factors;and determining, based on whether the subset of authentication factorsis verified, whether to authorize the requested database operation. 13.The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12, wherein thecurrent contextual information further includes an indication of the setof query data.
 14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim12, wherein the subset of authentication factors includes a factor thatinvolves a display, generated via an authenticator application, of anotification and a request for verification to a user associated withthe database operation request, and wherein the authenticatorapplication transmits the notification and request for display via anout-of-band mechanism.
 15. The non-transitory computer-readable mediumof claim 14, wherein the notification specifies at least a portion ofthe current contextual information, and wherein the set of query dataincluded in the current contextual information indicates a type of dataupon which the database operation is to be performed.
 16. Thenon-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12, wherein theoperations further comprise: transmitting, to a computing deviceassociated with another user, an authorization request for the databaseoperation, wherein the transmitting is performed based on the selectedsecurity level, and wherein the authorization request includes at leasta portion of the current contextual information.
 17. A method,comprising: receiving, by a computer system from a user device, adatabase operation request that specifies a set of query data;determining current contextual information for the database operationrequest, wherein the current contextual information includes anindication of the set of query data; inputting, by the computer systeminto a machine learning model trained using contextual information froma plurality of prior database requests, the current contextualinformation; initiating, by the computer system based on output of themachine learning model, a security level from a plurality of differentsecurity levels that requires verification of a particular subset ofauthentication factors supported by a known device of a user associatedwith the user device; and determining, by the computer system based onwhether the subset of authentication factors is verified, whether toauthorize the database operation.
 18. The method of claim 17, whereinthe particular subset of authentication factors includes a factor thatinvolves a display, generated via an authenticator application, of anotification and a request for verification to a user associated withthe database operation request.
 19. The method of claim 17, furthercomprising: transmitting, by the computer system to a computing deviceassociated with another user, an authorization request for the databaseoperation, wherein the transmitting is performed based on the initiatedsecurity level, and wherein the authorization request includes at leasta portion of the current contextual information.
 20. The method of claim17, wherein the current contextual information further includes anindication that the database operation is a data masking operation forthe set of query data and that the set of query data is stored in anon-production environment.